Consistency in Interpreting Federal Regulations Helps Assure Equitable Treatment of Subjects

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (1):11 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3564307

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

U.S. Federal Regulations for Emergency Research: A Practical Guide and Commentary.Andrew McRae & Charles Weijer - unknown
How 'supreme' can treaties be in a federal system of separated powers?Alex Glashausser - unknown
Compliance amd noncompliance with federal regulations for the protection of human subjects.Charles R. McCarthy - 1983 - In Brock K. Kilbourne & Maria T. Kilbourne (eds.), The Dark Side of Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific Division. pp. 1--101.
Shared Vulnerabilities in Research.Eric Chwang - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (12):3-11.
Interpretation of the Subjects' Condition Requirement: A Legal Perspective.Seema Shah & David Wendler - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):365-373.
Minimal risk revisited: the ethics of clinical research with children.Ariella Binik - unknown
Clinical Study Reflections: Another View: Commentary on: “Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting Misconduct”.Patricia Spitzig - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):705-711.
Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations.Celia B. Fisher - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):5-10.
Relevant academic literature, applicable federal regulations for the protection of human subjects on emergency research involving artificial/substitute blood products (including PolyHeme).Brandon Brown - forthcoming - Indiana University Center for Bioethics.
De Minimis Risk: A Proposal for a New Category of Research Risk.Abraham Schwab - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):1-7.
Moral dilemmas in perinatal medicine and the Quest for large scale embryo research: A discussion of recent guidelines in the federal republic of germany.Hans-Martin Sass - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (3):279-290.
Against Harmful Research on Non‐Agreeing Children.Eric Chwang - 2014 - Bioethics 29 (6):431-439.
Moral Gridlock: Conceptual Barriers to No‐Fault Compensation for Injured Research Subjects.Leslie Meltzer Henry - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):411-423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-30

Downloads
5 (#1,554,030)

6 months
5 (#693,173)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references