Cue discriminability predicts instrumental conditioning

, &
Consciousness and Cognition 61 (C):49-60 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.concog.2018.03.013

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Instrumental conditioning of the GSR: A comparison of light deprivation and monotony hypotheses.Maryrose Coffman & H. D. Kimmel - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):410.
Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning.Gregory A. Kimble, Lucie I. Mann & Robert H. Dufort - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (6):407.
Induction in differential instrumental conditioning.James R. Ison & Richard V. Krane - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):183.
Yoked comparisons of instrumental and classical eyelid conditioning.John W. Moore & I. Gormezano - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (6):552.
Influence of response discriminability on stimulus discriminability.J. F. Richard - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):30.
Transfer of training from differential classical to differential instrumental conditioning.Milton A. Trapold, George W. Lawton & Robert A. Dick - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (4p1):568.
Instrumental conditioning of orienting responses using positive reinforcement.Susan R. Shnidman - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (3p1):491.
Performance in instrumental conditioning as a joint function of time of deprivation and sucrose concentration.John R. Stabler - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):248.
Limits on reinterpreting instrumental conditioning in terms of classical conditioning.N. J. Mackintosh - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1):67-67.
Transfer of eyelid conditioning from instrumental to classical reinforcement and vice versa.David A. Grant, Neal E. A. Kroll, Barry Kantowitz, Michael J. Zajano & Kenneth B. Solberg - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):503.
Reversal of an instrumental discrimination by classical discriminative conditioning.Milton A. Trapold, Douglas M. Gross & George W. Lawton - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):686.
On stimulus and response discriminability.Harry P. Bahrick & Merrill Noble - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (6):449.
"Appropriateness" of the stimulus-reinforcement contingency in instrumental differential conditioning of the eyelid response to the arithmetic concepts of "right" and "wrong".Robert A. Fleming, Louise E. Cerekwicki & David A. Grant - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):295.
Response termination of the cue stimulus in classical and instrumental conditioning.Delos D. Wickens & Charles E. Platt - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (3):183.
Differential adaptation of anxious and nonanxious children in instrumental escape conditioning.Ronald K. Penney & Paul M. Kirwin - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (5):539.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-11

Downloads
33 (#476,734)

6 months
16 (#151,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking.Sid Kouider & Stanislas Dehaene - 2007 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 362 (1481):857-875.

View all 9 references / Add more references