Ad hocness and the appraisal of theories
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):355-361 (1978)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
K. R. Popper (1959). Discussions: Testability and ‘ Ad-Hocness ’ of the Contraction Hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):50-a-50.
K. R. Popper (1959). Testability and 'Ad-Hocness' of the Contraction Hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):50.
David Sander & Klaus R. Scherer (2005). Amalgams and the Power of Analytical Chemistry: Affective Science Needs to Decompose the Appraisal-Emotion Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):216-217.
Larry A. Herzberg (2009). Direction, Causation, and Appraisal Theories of Emotion. Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):167 – 186.
Aaron Ben-Ze’Ev (1997). Appraisal Theories of Emotions. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:129-143.
Greg Bamford (1993). Popper's Explications of Ad Hocness: Circularity, Empirical Content, and Scientific Practice. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):335-355.
Wesley C. Salmon (1990). The Appraisal of Theories: Kuhn Meets Bayes. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:325 - 332.
Georg Northoff (2008). Is Appraisal 'Embodied' and 'Embedded'? A Neurophilosophical Investigation of Emotions. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (5):68-99.
M. Redhead (1978). Discussions Notes: Ad Hocness and the Appraisal of Theories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):355-361.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,844 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |

