Removal of the Niqab in Court: A Structural Barrier to Equality

In Amina Easat-Daas & Irene Zempi (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gendered Islamophobia. Springer Verlag. pp. 183-199 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter considers whether the approach of the justice system to women who manifest their faith through the wearing of the niqab (face veil) serves to marginalise this group. Court decisions in cases where women have wished to retain their niqab whilst giving evidence have often recognised the importance of the religious right but then treated it as being subservient to the right of the opposing party to a fair trial. This chapter will argue that this argument is misplaced as the niqab does not obstruct the ability of the court to assess the credibility of the witness. Whilst judges deciding on such cases have limited discretion to interfere with existing practices, governments do, and there should be clear guidance to ensure that religious minorities are not deterred from asserting their legal rights in the courts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Challenging the Burqa Ban.Luara Ferracioli - 2013 - Journal of Intercultural Studies 34 (1):89-101.
Social Equality in an Alternate World.Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (6):54-55.
Dworkin's Shadow: Equality Rights and the Supreme Court of Canada's Loss of Dignity.Bradley W. Miller - 2013 - Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoria Del Derecho 1 (7):149-184.
Pertinence of a General Prohibition of the Burqa and Niqab in Spain: A Human Rights Perspective.David Fernández Rojo - 2014 - Yearbook of Humanitarian Action and Human Rights/Anuario de Acción Humanitaria y Derechos Humanos 12:209–234.
Gender Equality and Reproductive Decision-Making.Sally Sheldon - 2004 - Feminist Legal Studies 12 (3):303-316.
The ethics of interpreter use.Ben Gray & Jo Hilder - 2021 - Clinical Ethics 16 (4):354-358.
Proving Domestic Violence as Gender Structural Discrimination before the European Court of Human Rights.Katarzyna Sękowska-Kozłowska - forthcoming - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-13.
A Hazy Concept of Equality.Mark Bell - 2004 - Feminist Legal Studies 12 (2):223-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-28

Downloads
1 (#1,910,137)

6 months
1 (#1,508,101)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references