Filópono y el Pseudo Justino contra la eternidad del movimiento

Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 38 (1):117-134 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present two of the most important critiques that Physics VIII has received. In order to do so, I will draw on two Greek commentators of the corpus who are very well-known due to the sharpness of their critiques to the oeuvre of the Stagirite, as well as due to their deep understanding of it. The first objection that I will look at appears in the commentary to the Physics of John Philoponus, while the second one is taken from an author called the Pseudo-Justin. Before I address them, I will briefly look at the two Aristotelian arguments to which the above objections allude.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Were Aristotle's Intentions in Writing the De Anima Forgotten in Late Antiquity?H. J. Blumenthal - 1997 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 8:143-157.
The idea of a pseudo-problem in Mach, Hertz, and Boltzmann.John Preston - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (1):55-77.
A proposito di Giovanni Filopono cristiano e gli studi di Étienne Évrard.Angela Longo - 2022 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 43 (1):165-178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references