Outcome of 185 pregnancies studied by prenatal genomic array technique: Bioethical reflections

Clinical Ethics 17 (4):442-448 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Prenatal genetic diagnosis with new high-performance technologies such as genomic array adds great complexity to the ethical dilemmas that already exist in current medicine. The main objective of this study was to carry out an analysis and bioethical reflections centred on the outcome associated with the use of the genetic array technique in 185 pregnancies at the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe (Valencia, Spain). It is an observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study during the years 2014 to 2017, inclusive. We analyse the results and the follow-up of the 185 cases in which this prenatal genetic study was carried out by array technique. Of the 185 prenatal genetic studies carried out, 165 showed no copy number variants (normal result) and in the 20 remaining pregnancies (10.81%), a dose change was detected. Abortion was carried out in 11 cases with pathological and/or probably pathological abnormalities. Of the 165 cases in which no dose variant was detected, an abortion was carried out in 49 cases, which represents 29.7%. The introduction of new genomic analysis techniques to invasive prenatal diagnosis highlights the ethical problems that arise above all in the interpretation of genetic variants detected and genetic counselling, while emphasising the need for correct informed consent and it adds, if possible, more controversy to a subject with great bioethical substance such as abortion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prenatal screening in Jewish law.J. Brown - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (2):75-80.
When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?Javiera Perez Gomez - 2020 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 30 (1):71-109.
Currents in Contemporary Bioethics.Amy L. McGuire, Melody J. Wang & Frank J. Probst - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):1040-1046.
Currents in Contemporary Bioethics.Amy L. McGuire, Melody J. Wang & Frank J. Probst - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):1040-1046.
Where's the harm? : challenging bioethical support of prenatal selection for sexual orientation.Janice McLaughlin - 2010 - In Jackie Leach Scully, Laurel Baldwin-Ragaven & Petya Fitzpatrick (eds.), Feminist Bioethics: At the Center, on the Margins. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking.Adrian Thorogood & Ma'N. H. Zawati - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):690-702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-03

Downloads
5 (#1,539,211)

6 months
2 (#1,196,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Javier González
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references