Religion and the theories of science: A response to Barbour
Zygon 31 (1):29-41 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStefano Bigliardi (2012). Barbour's Typologies and the Contemporary Debate on Islam and Science. Zygon 47 (3):501-519.
Ian G. Barbour (1996). Response to Critiques of Religion in an Age of Science. Zygon 31 (1):51-65.
Ian G. Barbour (1988). On Two Issues in Science and Religion: A Response to David Griffin. Zygon 23 (1):83-88.
Andrew P. Porter (1996). Science, Religious Language, and Analogy. Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):113-120.
Jared Michael Jones (2005). Science and Religion: A Search for Synergism. Dissertation, Texas A&M University
Ian G. Barbour (1966). Issues in Science and Religion. Prentice-Hall.
Ian G. Barbour (1990). Religion in an Age of Science. Harper and Row.
Ian G. Barbour (1975). Science, Religion, and the Counterculture. Zygon 10 (4):380-397.
Ian G. Barbour (2008). Taking Science Seriously Without Scientism: A Response to Taede Smedes. Zygon 43 (1):259-269.
Ian G. Barbour (2002). On Typologies for Relating Science and Religion. Zygon 37 (2):345-360.
Ian G. Barbour (1994). Experiencing and Interpreting Nature in Science and Religion. Zygon 29 (4):457-487.
Taede A. Smedes (2008). Taking Theology and Science Seriously Without Category Mistakes: A Response to Ian Barbour. Zygon 43 (1):271-276.
Ian G. Barbour (2001). Science and Scientism in Huston Smith's Why Religion Matters. Zygon 36 (2):207-214.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads3 ( #201,695 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
