The human autonomous karyotype and the origins of prenatal testing: Children, pregnant women and early Down's syndrome cytogenetics, Madrid 1962–1975

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:142-153 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.05.014

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Attitudes About Prenatal Hiv Testing in Turkey.Nermin Ersoy & Aslıhan Akpınar - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (2):222-233.
A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome.Chris Kaposy - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (4):299-324.
People with down syndrome - part of our community.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 18 (2):1.
Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome.Hsien-Hsien Chiang, Y. M. Yu Chao & Y. S. Yuh - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5):273-277.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Opt-out HIV testing: An ethical analysis of women's reproductive rights.L. Fields & C. Kaplan - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (5):734-742.
Institute of Medical Ethics: working party report. HIV infection: the ethics of anonymised testing and of testing pregnant women.K. M. Boyd - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):173-178.
Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions.E. Garcia, D. R. M. Timmermans & E. van Leeuwen - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):461-465.
Beyond informed choice: prenatal risk assessment, decision-making and trust.Nete Schwennesen, Mette Nordahl Svendsen & Lene Koch - 2010 - Clinical Ethics 5 (4):207-216.
Provider-initiated hiv testing and counseling in health facilities – what does this mean for the health and human rights of pregnant women?Sofia Gruskin, Shahira Ahmed & Laura Ferguson - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):23–32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-05

Downloads
13 (#1,031,809)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Human genetics after the bomb: Archives, clinics, proving grounds and board rooms.Susan Lindee - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 55:45-53.

Add more citations

References found in this work

'Your true and proper gender': the Barr body as a good enough science of sex.Fiona Alice Miller - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):459-483.
‘Your true and proper gender’: the Barr body as a good enough science of sex.Fiona Alice Miller - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):459-483.

Add more references