The paradox of the stone
Philosophical Review 76 (1):74-79 (1967)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJim Stone Stone (2005). Why There Are Still No People. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70.
R. L. Stone (1968). Book Review:Legal System and Lawyers' Reasonings. Julius Stone. [REVIEW] Ethics 78 (4):322-.
David BooninâVail (1989). The Parthenon Papers. Critical Review 3 (3-4):579-588.
Laurence Goldstein (1982). Linguistic Aspects, Meaninglessness and Paradox: A Rejoinder to John David Stone. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (4):579 - 592.
John David Stone (1981). Meaninglessness and Paradox: Some Remarks on Goldstein's Paper. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (3):423 - 429.
Joseph B. Kadane, Christopher A. Stone & Garrick Wallstrom (1999). The Donation Paradox for Peremptory Challenges. Theory and Decision 47 (2):139-155.
David E. Schrader (1979). A Solution to the Stone Paradox. Synthese 42 (2):255-264.
M. P. Smith (1988). The New Paradox of the Stone. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):283-290.
Erik J. Wielenberg (2001). The New Paradox of the Stone Revisited. Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads107 ( #5,332 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #3,666 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
