Breaches in good regulatory practice – the HFEA policy on compensated egg sharing for stem cell research

Clinical Ethics 3 (1):20-24 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority policy on permitting ova provision for research purposes breaches good regulatory practice in being inconsistent, unaccountable and untargeted. This article will illustrate how these breaches have resulted in a policy which is unfair to ova providers who wish to contribute to stem cell research and undermines the intentions behind the policy's very inception. (This article is based on a paper entitled Appropriate Recompense for Oocytes in Stem Cell Research presented at the Stem Cells: Hope or Hype debate, North West Genetics Knowledge Park, Manchester in May 2007.)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stem cell research: An ethical evaluation of policy options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Animal eggs for stem cell research: A path not worth taking. Fran - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):18 – 32.
Stem Cell Research and Economic Promises.Timothy Caulfield - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):303-313.
Moral complicity in induced pluripotent stem cell research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
18 (#831,783)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references