Vivarium 50 (1):85-109 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract The aim of the paper is to reassess the role of British Aristotelianism within the history of early modern logic between the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as a crucial moment of cultural transition from the model of humanistic rhetoric and dialectic to that of facultative logic, that is, a logic which concerns the study of the cognitive powers of the mind. The paper shows that there is a special connection between Paduan Aristotelianism and British empiricism, through the mediation of British Aristotelianism. British Aristotelians took the ideas of the Paduan Aristotelian tradition and carried them to an extreme, gradually removing them from the original Aristotelian context in which they were grounded and developing what would later become the fundamental ideas of British empiricism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patrick Toner (2013). On Aristotelianism and Structures as Parts. Ratio 26 (1):148-161.
Paul Schuurman (ed.) (2004). Ideas, Mental Faculties, and Method: The Logic of Ideas of Descartes and Locke and its Reception in the Dutch Republic. Brill.
Charles Morton (1995). Aristotelian and Cartesian Logic at Harvard: Charles Morton's a Logick System & William Brattle's Compendium of Logick. Published by the Colonial Society of Massachusetts and Distributed by the University Press of Virginia.
Kelvin Knight (2007). Aristotelian Philosophy: Ethics and Politics From Aristotle to Macintyre. Polity.
Kelvin Knight (2011). Revolutionary Aristotelianism. In Paul Blackledge & Kelvin Knight (eds.), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair Macintyre's Revolutionary Aristotelianism. University of Notre Dame Press.
Erik Eliasson (2012). Platonism and Aristotelianism (T.) Bénatouïl, (E.) Maffi, (F.) Trabattoni (Edd.) Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues Between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. (Europaea Memoria 85.) Pp. X + 278. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: Georg Olms, 2011. Paper, €42.80. ISBN: 978-3-487-14545-7. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (02):459-461.
Tony Burns (2011). Revolutionary Aristotelianism? : The Political Thought of Aristotle, Marx, and MacIntyre. In Paul Blackledge & Kelvin Knight (eds.), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair Macintyre's Revolutionary Aristotelianism. University of Notre Dame Press.
Robert Pasnau (2010). Form and Matter. In Robert Pasnau (ed.), Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Robert J. Roth (1993). British Empiricism and American Pragmatism: New Directions and Neglected Arguments. Fordham University Press.
Michael Gill (2006). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge ;Cambridge University Press.
Stephen L. Darwall (1995). The British Moralists and the Internal "Ought", 1640-1740. Cambridge University Press.
Margaret Mathieson & Gerald Bernbaum (1988). The British Disease: A British Tradition? British Journal of Educational Studies 36 (2):126 - 174.
Stephen Priest (1990). The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer. Viking Penguin.
Alasdair MacIntyre (2011). How Aristotelianism Can Become Revolutionary : Ethics, Resistance, and Utopia. In Paul Blackledge & Kelvin Knight (eds.), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair Macintyre's Revolutionary Aristotelianism. University of Notre Dame Press.
Susan Brower-Toland (2002). Instantaneous Change and the Physics of Sanctification: "Quasi-Aristotelianism" in Henry of Ghent's. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (1).
Added to index2012-04-17
Total downloads10 ( #107,683 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?