The Regulative Role of the Ideas and Principles of Reason in Kant's Philosophy

Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 1 (202):77-88 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Kant's view the pure ideas of reason possesses two different functions. One of them is the impropet function of ideas that Kant calls it transcendent function when we consider an external extension for our ideas in the case of which ideas plays a regulative role. The other function is that of the proper one that Kant calls it the immanent function of ideas when ideas merely is directed towards the pure concepts of understanding and their functions in which case the role of ideas would be regulative; namely to explain the unity and consistency of knowledge stemmed from understanding. This article is an attempt to make a critical study of Kant's view concerning the role of ideas and pure principles of reason.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is Hypothetical Reason a Precursor to Reflective Judgment?Suma Rajiva - 2006 - Kant Studien 97 (1):114-126.
Is Kant (W)right? – On Kant’s Regulative Ideas and Wright’s Entitlements.Jochen Briesen - 2013 - Kant-Yearbook 5 (1):1-32.
Rational feelings.Alix Cohen - 2017 - In Diane Williamson & Kelly Sorensen (eds.), Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press. pp. 9-24.
Kant on historiography and the use of regulative ideas.Pauline Kleingeld - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):523-528.
The Satisfaction of Reason: The Mathematical/Dynamical Distinction in the Critique of Pure Reason.Brent Adkins - 1999 - Kantian Review 3:64-80.
Do principles of reason have objective but indeterminate validity?Nathaniel Jason Goldberg - 2004 - Kant Studien 95 (4):405-425.
Mind of God, Point of View of Man or Something Not Quite Either?Paul Redding - 2019 - In Paolo Diego Bubbio, Maurizio Pagano, Hager Weslati & Alessandro De Cesaris (eds.), in Paolo Diego Bubbio, Maurizio Pagano, Hager Weslati and Alessandro De Cesaris (eds), Hegel, Logic and Speculation, London: Bloomsbury, ISBN-13: 978-1350056367. DOI: 10.5040/9781350056381.ch-011. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 147-170.
The Origins of Kant's "Critique of Judgment".Ted Kinnaman - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Kant and the Dilemma of Reason.Marshell Carl Bradley - 1984 - Dissertation, Duquesne University
A short commentary on Kant's Critique of pure reason.Alfred Cyril Ewing - 1938 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
A look at the place of "Transcendental" in Kant's Theoretical Philosophy.Ali Akbar Abdolabadi - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 4 (216):81-103.
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason.Sebastian Gardner - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
The Second Half of the Transcendental Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (B).Hirotaka Nakano - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):5–20.
The ideas of pure reason.Michael Rohlf - 2010 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Unity of Apperception and the Division of Labour in the Transcendental Analytic.Richard E. Aquila - 1997 - Kantian Review 1:17-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
1 (#1,899,472)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references