Probabilities of electoral outcomes: from three-candidate to four-candidate elections

, &
Theory and Decision 88 (2):205-229 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to compute the theoretical likelihood of some electoral outcomes under the impartial anonymous culture in four-candidate elections by using the last versions of software like LattE or Normaliz. By comparison with the three-candidate case, our results allow to analyze the impact of the number of candidates on the occurrence of these voting outcomes.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11238-019-09724-5

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Plurality Rule Works In Three-Candidate Elections.Bernardo Moreno & M. Socorro Puy - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (2):145-162.
Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: different perspectives on balanced preferences.William V. Gehrlein - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (2):171-199.
Can Television Ads Persuade? Strategy and Choice of Television Advertising in U.S. House of Representatives Elections.Searle David Mordecai - unknown
Defending Joy against the Popular Revolution: legitimation and delegitimation through songs.Francesco Screti - 2013 - Critical Discourse Studies 10 (2):205-222.
Vote Buying and Voter Preferences.James Stacey Taylor - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (1):107-124.
Condorcet’s principle and the strong no-show paradoxes.Conal Duddy - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (2):275-285.
Innovations of Candidate Selection Methods: Polling Primary and Kobo under the New Electoral Rules in Taiwan and Japan.Ching-Hsin Yu & Chen-Hua Yu - 2014 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 15 (4):635-659.
Electoral marketing and engineering problems of election.O. Ye Shinkarenko - 2013 - Granì 1:43-47.
Condorcet efficiency of the preference approval voting and the probability of selecting the Condorcet loser.Eric Kamwa - 2019 - Theory and Decision 87 (3):299-320.
Effectiveness of political advertising in the electoral process: experience on extraordinary presidential elections – 2014 in Ukraine.G. V. Muzychenko - 2014 - Granì 9:76-82.
Voting frequentia as an indicator of political activity.V. V. Kryvoshein - 2017 - Granì 16 (8):141-148.
How Does Separability Affect The Desirability Of Referendum Election Outcomes?Jonathan K. Hodge & Peter Schwallier - 2006 - Theory and Decision 61 (3):251-276.
The ninth Majlis elections in Iran: Electoral laws, procedures and institutions.Abdol Moghset Bani Kamal - 2013 - Intellectual Discourse 21 (1).
Black Urban Administrations.Adolph Reed - 1985 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1985 (65):47-58.
Belief-Overkill in Political Judgments.Jonathan Baron - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):368-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-14

Downloads
17 (#875,159)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Condorcet's paradox.William V. Gehrlein - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (2):161-197.
Appendix.[author unknown] - 1993 - The Personalist Forum 9 (1):53-61.
The Theory of Committees and Elections.Duncan Black - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (137):248-249.

Add more references