Two apparent paradoxes about justice and the severity of punishment

Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):123-128 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea of Mitigation incorporates the conviction that though the amount or severity of punishment is primarily to be determined by reference to the General Aim, yet Justice requires that those who have special difficulties to face in keeping the law which they have broken should be punished less.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice and punishment: the rationale of coercion.Matt Matravers - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2012 - In Deen Chatterjee (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer. pp. 915-17.
The Comparative Nature of Punishment.Adam J. Kolber - 2009 - Boston University Law Review 89 (5):1565-1608.
Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2012 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Criminal punishment and restorative justice: past, present, and future perspectives.David J. Cornwell - 2006 - Portland, Or.: North American distributor, International Specialised Book Services. Edited by F. W. M. McElrea, John R. Blad & Robert B. Cormier.
Divine retribution: A defence.Oliver D. Crisp - 2003 - Sophia 42 (2):35-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
23 (#687,700)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saul Smilansky
University of Haifa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references