Philosophy of Science 55 (1):39-57 (1988)
|Abstract||There is sufficient evidence at present to justify the belief that the universe began to exist without being caused to do so. This evidence includes the Hawking-Penrose singularity theorems that are based on Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, and the recently introduced Quantum Cosmological Models of the early universe. The singularity theorems lead to an explication of the beginning of the universe that involves the notion of a Big Bang singularity, and the Quantum Cosmological Models represent the beginning largely in terms of the notion of a vacuum fluctuation. Theories that represent the universe as infinitely old or as caused to begin are shown to be at odds with or at least unsupported by these and other current cosmological notions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Quentin Smith (2000). Concerning the Metaphysical Necessity of the Universe Beginning Uncaused. Philo 3 (1):73-75.
Ruediger Vaas, Time Before Time - Classifications of Universes in Contemporary Cosmology, and How to Avoid the Antinomy of the Beginning and Eternity of the World.
Quentin Smith (1997). Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists. Philosophy 72 (279):125-.
William Lane Craig (1999). A Swift and Simple Refutation of the Kalam Cosmological Argument? Religious Studies 35 (1):57-72.
Robert J. Deltete (2000). Is the Universe Self-Caused? Philosophy 75 (4):599-603.
David S. Oderberg (2003). The Beginning of Existence. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):145-157.
Gerrit Smith & Robert Weingard (1990). Quantum Cosmology and the Beginning of the Universe. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):663-667.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,632 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?