Graduate studies at Western
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (1):59-72 (1990)
|Abstract||Clifton, Butterfield, and Redhead  have constructed two separate arguments that bear some resemblances to a proof of mine pertaining to the nonlocal character of quantum theory. Their arguments have flaws, which they point out. I explicate my proof by explaining in detail both how it differs logically from the two arguments they have constructed, and how it avoids the pitfalls of both. *This work was supported by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Division of High Energy Physics of the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-ACO3-76SF00098.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Bain (forthcoming). Effective Field Theories. In R. Batterman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford Univ Press.
Henry P. Stapp, Dear Walter, My Article ``Whiteheadian Process and Quantum Theory of Mind'' Was the First `Target Article' on the E Forum.
Paul Teller (1982). Comments on the Papers of Cushing and Redhead: "Models, High-Energy Theoretical Physics and Realism" and "Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:100 - 111.
Henry P. Stapp (2012). Quantum Locality? Foundations of Physics 42 (5):647-655.
Robert K. Clifton, Jeremy N. Butterfield & Michael L. G. Redhead (1990). Nonlocal Influences and Possible Worlds--A Stapp in the Wrong Direction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (1):5-58.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,434 of 734,603 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?