Betting on Quantum Objects

Abstract

Dutch book arguments have been applied to beliefs about the outcomes of measurements of quantum systems, but not to beliefs about quantum objects prior to measurement. In this paper, we prove a quantum version of the probabilists' Dutch book theorem that applies to both sorts of beliefs: roughly, if ideal beliefs are given by vector states, all and only Born-rule probabilities avoid Dutch books. This theorem and associated results have implications for operational and realist interpretations of the logic of a Hilbert lattice. In the latter case, we show that the defenders of the eigenstate-value orthodoxy face a trilemma. Those who favor vague properties avoid the trilemma, admitting all and only those beliefs about quantum objects that avoid Dutch books.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Betting on the outcomes of measurements: a Bayesian theory of quantum probability.Itamar Pitowsky - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):395-414.
Betting on the outcomes of measurements: A bayesian theory of quantum probability.Itamar Pitowsky - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):395-414.
The Case for Quantum State Realism.Morgan C. Tait - 2012 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario
Operational foundation of quantum logic.P. Mittelstaedt & E. W. Stachow - 1974 - Foundations of Physics 4 (3):355-365.
Two Forms of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundations.Jer Steeger & Nicholas Teh - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1083-1110.
Remarks on the Theory of Quasi-sets.Steven French & Décio Krause - 2010 - Studia Logica 95 (1-2):101 - 124.
Quantum Theory Without Hilbert Spaces.C. Anastopoulos - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (11):1545-1580.
Do we really understand quantum mechanics?Franck Laloë - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Intrinsic Properties of Quantum Systems.P. Hájíček & J. Tolar - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (5):411-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
17 (#862,403)

6 months
6 (#509,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jer Steeger
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and probability.Frank Ramsey - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 52-94.
The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.Simon Kochen & E. P. Specker - 1967 - Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17:59--87.
Whence the eigenstate–eigenvalue link?Marian J. R. Gilton - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55:92-100.
Betting on the outcomes of measurements: a Bayesian theory of quantum probability.Itamar Pitowsky - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):395-414.
Weak discernibility.Katherine Hawley - 2006 - Analysis 66 (4):300–303.

View all 7 references / Add more references