The Disciplinary Frame: Photographic Truths and the Capture of Meaning

Univ of Minnesota Press (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Tagg claims that, to answer this question, we must look at the ways in which everything that frames photography - the discourse that surrounds it and the institutions that circulate it - determines what counts as truth.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

More on 'The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Theorem'.A. W. Moore - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1):103-126.
Objectivity in photography.Scott Walden - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):258-272.
Given time: biology, nature and photographic vision.Steve Garlick - 2009 - History of the Human Sciences 22 (5):81-101.
Photographic Art: An Ontology Fit to Print.Christy Mag Uidhir - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):31-42.
The analytic-synthetic distinction.Stanley Munsat - 1971 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
10 (#1,191,137)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?