Divine Eros and Divine Providence in Proclus’ Educational System

Peitho 5 (1):163-176 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study examines the way in which the Neoplatonic philosopher Proclus treats an episode of the dialectic communication between Socrates and Alcibiades in the Platonic dialogue Alcibiades I. More specifically, it refers to how the characteristics and the choices of two different types of lovers – the divinely inspired one and the vulgar one – are displayed in the aforementioned text. The characterization ‘divinely inspired lover’ befits a person who communicates in a pure way with his beloved one and attempts to teach the latter the objective values of the intellect. By contrast, the characterization of the ‘vulgar lover’ befits that individual that approaches another individual exclusively on the basis of his external beauty. The first type of lover is presented within the realms of the permanently qualitative, while the second as someone who satisfies solemnly his subjectivity and his instincts. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that Proclus argues that Socrates, whom he considers to represent the very definition of a divinely inspired lover, is inspired by divine powers and attempts to act towards to his fellows – in this instance to Alcibiades – in the way through which the divine providence is revealed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neoplatonic Providence and Descent: a Test-Case from Proclus’ Alcibiades Commentary.D. A. Vasilakis - 2019 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 13 (2):153-171.
“myth-makers”. Poetic Discourse In The Commentary On The Republic Of Patroclo.José Zamora Calvo - 2014 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 20:145-172.
Bemerkungen zu Substanz und Wissen Gottes in Boethius’ Philosophiae consolatio.Andreas Bächli - 2001 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 6 (1):21-51.
Bemerkungen zu Substanz und Wissen Gottes in Boethius’ Philosophiae consolatio.Andreas Bächli - 2001 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 6:21-51.
Divine providence.Thomas P. Flint - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Apophaticism in the Search for Knowledge: Love as a Key Difference in Neoplatonic and Christian Epistemology.E. Brown Dewhurst - 2019 - In Panagiotis G. Pavlos, Lars Fredrik Janby, Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson & Torstein Theodor Tollefsen (eds.), Platonism and Christian Thought in Late Antiquity. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 239-257.
Eros and Philosophical Seduction in Alcibiades I.Jill Gordon - 2003 - Ancient Philosophy 23 (1):11-30.
Divine Perfection and Creation.R. T. Mullins - 2016 - Heythrop Journal 57 (1):122-134.
Divine Love and the Argument from Divine Hiddenness.Ebrahim Azadegan - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):101--116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-06

Downloads
9 (#1,252,744)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proclus et le crépuscule de la pensée grecque.Paul Bastid - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:228-229.

Add more references