Are Ancient Logics Explosive?

History and Philosophy of Logic 45 (2):109-123 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The twentieth-century logical mainstream, derived from works by Łukasiewicz and Scholz, pictures the history of logic for the most part as the prehistory of Boolean–Fregean mathematical logic. Particularly, with respect to classical propositional calculus, the Stoic logic has been pictured as an early stage of it and Aristotle's or the Peripatetics' logic as a theory that assumes it. Although it was not emphasised, it follows that the ancient logics contain the principle of explosion. In the endmost quarter of the twentieth century, a competitive view began to spread to the effect that the ancient systems of logic were paraconsistent or relevantistic. In the twenty-first century, the latter view prevails and has every chance of becoming a new orthodoxy. It is claimed that although in Łukasiewicz's argument for the classicality of ancient logics, there are gaps, it may be demonstrated that the ancient logics contain the principle of explosion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Principle of Explosion in the Stoic Logic.Marcin Tkaczyk - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-21.
What is a Paraconsistent Logic?Damian Szmuc, Federico Pailos & Eduardo Barrio - 2018 - In Walter Carnielli & Jacek Malinowski (eds.), Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Metainferential Paraconsistency.Bruno Da Ré, Mariela Rubin & Paula Teijeiro - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-26.
Total Paraconsistency.Bruno Da Ré - 2019 - Humanities Journal of Valparaiso 13:90-101.
Paraconsistent Logic.David Ripley - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):771-780.
Total Paraconsistency.Bruno Da Ré - 2019 - Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 13:90-101.
Paraconsistency and its Philosophical Interpretations.Eduardo Barrio & Bruno Da Re - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Logic 15 (2):151-170.
Paraconsistency Everywhere.Greg Restall - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
On Paraconsistency.Bryson Brown - 2006 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 628–650.
Paraconsistent Logical Consequence.Dale Jacquette - 1998 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 8 (4):337-351.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-26

Downloads
5 (#1,537,892)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Prior Analytics. Aristotle & Robin Smith - 1989 - New York: Kessinger Publishing. Edited by Gisela Striker.
What Is So Bad About Contradictions?Graham Priest - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy 95 (8):410-426.
Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic.JAN LUKASIEWICZ - 1951 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 57 (4):456-458.
Stoic Syllogistic.Susanne Bobzien - 1996 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133-92.
Topics.Robin Aristotle & Smith - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Robin Smith & Aristotle.

View all 16 references / Add more references