Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as if It was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority

Praxis Filosófica 35:311-315 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Steven ShapinThe Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 552 pgs.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i35.3489

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Never pure: historical studies of science as if it was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture, and society, and struggling for credibility and authority.Steven Shapin - 2010 - Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
False modesty: Steven Shapin: Never pure: Historical studies of science as if it was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture, and society, and struggling for credibility and authority. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010, 568pp, $70.00 HB, $32.00 PB.Adrian Johns - 2014 - Metascience 23 (1):1-6.
Shapin, Steven.(2010). Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as if It was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN-10: 0-80189421-2. Number of pages: 552. [REVIEW]Javier Toro - 2013 - Universitas Philosophica 30 (60):279-283.
Reflections On Kant’s Concept Of Space.Lisa Shabel - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):45-57.
Science qua science is not morally neutral.John E. McPeck - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:858-864.
How to Characterise Pure and Applied Science.Aboutorab Yaghmaie - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (2):133-149.
A Science of Pure Consciousness?: R. L. FRANKLIN.R. L. Franklin - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (2):185-204.
Historical and Epistemological Reflections on the Culture of Machines around the Renaissance: How Science and Technique Work?Raffaele Pisano & Paolo Bussotti - 2014 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 2 (2):20-42.
What is wrong with “technology as applied science?”.Sunny Auyang - manuscript
How applied mathematics became pure.Penelope Maddy - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):16-41.
Blindness or insight? Kittler on culture.Matthias Bickenbach - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 107 (1):39-46.
Memory and historical Jesus studies: Formgeschichte in a new dress?Ernest van Eck - 2015 - HTS Theological Studies 71 (1):10.
“Innovation Studies”: Staking the Claim for a New Disciplinary “Tribe”.Benoît Godin - 2014 - Minerva 52 (4):489-495.
Science in context: readings in the sociology of science.Barry Barnes & David O. Edge (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pure natural science as pure doctrine of motion.Ae Miller & Mg Miller - 1994 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 159:291-312.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-08

Downloads
3 (#1,723,243)

6 months
2 (#1,243,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references