David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 39 (2):165-183 (2003)
In recent years, many resourceful thinkers have brought a new clarity to the issues surrounding the doctrine of the Trinity. Two incompatible families of Trinitarian doctrine have been clearly distinguished: Social Trinitarianism and Latin Trinitarianism. I argue here that no theory in either camp has yet evaded the triune pitfalls of inconsistency, unintelligibility, and poor fit with the Bible. These two main approaches appear to be hopeless, and I argue that appeals to ‘mystery’ are no way to avoid the difficulties at hand. Thus, the Trinitarian project is as yet unfinished.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark Walker (2009). The Anthropic Argument Against the Existence of God. Sophia 48 (4):351 - 378.
Einar Duenger Bohn (2011). The Logic of the Trinity. Sophia 50 (3):363-374.
Dale Tuggy (2011). On Positive Mysterianism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):205-226.
Bruce P. Baugus (2013). Paradox and Mystery in Theology. Heythrop Journal 54 (2):238-251.
Similar books and articles
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2009). Late Medieval Trinitarian Syllogistics: From the Theological Debates to a Logical Textbook. In A. Schuman (ed.), Logic in Religious Discourse. Ontos Verlag
Andres Jimenez Colodrero (2011). Theology and Politics in Thomas Hobbes's Trinitarian Theory. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):62-77.
Michael Rea (2006). Polytheism and Christian Belief. Journal of Theological Studies 57:133-48.
Linn Tonstad (2009). »The Ultimate Consequence of His Self-Distinction From the Father. . . «: Difference and Hierarchy in Pannenberg's Trinity. [REVIEW] Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (4):383-399.
Thomas H. McCall (2010). Which Trinity? Whose Monotheism?: Philosophical and Systematic Theologians on the Metaphysics of Trinitarian Theology. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
James Anderson (2005). In Defence of Mystery: A Reply to Dale Tuggy. Religious Studies 41 (2):145-163.
Maria Rosa Antognazza (2001). Leibniz de Deo Trino: Philosophical Aspects of Leibniz's Conception of the Trinity. Religious Studies 37 (1):1-13.
H. E. Baber (2008). Trinity, Filioque and Semantic Ascent. Sophia 47 (2):149 - 160.
Dale Tuggy (2004). Divine Deception, Identity, and Social Trinitarianism. Religious Studies 40 (3):269-287.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #104,520 of 1,700,257 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #206,271 of 1,700,257 )
How can I increase my downloads?