The unfinished business of trinitarian theorizing

Religious Studies 39 (2):165-183 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, many resourceful thinkers have brought a new clarity to the issues surrounding the doctrine of the Trinity. Two incompatible families of Trinitarian doctrine have been clearly distinguished: Social Trinitarianism and Latin Trinitarianism. I argue here that no theory in either camp has yet evaded the triune pitfalls of inconsistency, unintelligibility, and poor fit with the Bible. These two main approaches appear to be hopeless, and I argue that appeals to ‘mystery’ are no way to avoid the difficulties at hand. Thus, the Trinitarian project is as yet unfinished.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
95 (#180,793)

6 months
10 (#263,328)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Trinity.Dale Tuggy - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Logic of the Trinity.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2011 - Sophia 50 (3):363-374.
Ahistoricity in Analytic Theology.Beau Branson - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):195-224.
Mutual Indwelling.Aaron Cotnoir - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (2):123-151.
The Logical Problem of the Trinity.Beau Branson - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references