The Body As Crowbar: Transcending Or Stretching Sex?

Feminist Theory 5 (1):25-47 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can paradoxical or ambiguous sexual identities and practices change, or even go beyond, the meanings of masculinity and femininity? In other words: can the body be a source of social change? To answer this question I turn to the work of two theorists: Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler. After an account of their ideas, various sexual practices and identities will be described. The question is whether these practices and identities affect the meanings of masculinity and femininity. It will be concluded that, even in our postmodern world with its technological opportunities the division into the two sexes is extraordinarily persistent. However, we can expect some change from the extension of the categories of masculinity and femininity, rather than from attempts to break free from them altogether.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embodied practices: feminist perspectives on the body.Kathy Davis (ed.) - 1997 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Freud on Femininity and Faith.Judith Van Herik - 1982 - University of California Press, C1982.
Corporeality, Sadomasochism and Sexual Trauma.Corie Hammers - 2014 - Body and Society 20 (2):68-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
11 (#1,120,716)

6 months
9 (#295,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?