Boethus the Epicurean

Philosophie Antique 15:205-224 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cet article se concentre principalement sur Boéthos, philosophe épicurien qui a été souvent négligé : aucune source ancienne, excepté Plutarque, ne le mentionne. L’étude tente d’examiner la perspective philosophique de Boéthos et, plus particulièrement, son attitude envers la géométrie.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Gassendi an Epicurean?Monte Ransome Johnson - 2003 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):339 - 360.
Epicurean atomism.Pierre-Marie Morel - 2009 - In James Warren (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 65.
Early Modern Accounts of Epicureanism.Stewart Duncan & Antonia LoLordo - forthcoming - In Jacob Klein & Nathan Powers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Some Thoughts on the Epicurean Critique of Mathematics.Michael Aristidou - 2017 - Journal of Humanistic Mathematics 7 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
4 (#1,630,023)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

In search of an epicurean catharsis.Enrico Piergiacomi - 2019 - Philosophie Antique 19:117-150.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two conceptions of vacuum.David Sedley - 1982 - Phronesis 27 (1):175--93.
Two Conceptions of Vacuum.David Sedley - 1982 - Phronesis 27 (2):175 - 193.

Add more references