Historical Epidemiology and the Single Pathogen Model of Epidemic Disease

Centaurus 64 (1):197-206 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pre-existing medical conditions and co-infections are common to all human populations, although the natures of the pre-existing conditions and the types of co-infections vary. For these reasons, among others, the arrival of a highly infectious pathogenic agent may differentially affect the disease burden in different sub-populations, as a function of varying combinations of endemic disease, chronic disease, genetic or epigenetic vulnerabilities, compromised immunological status, and socially determined risk exposure. The disease burden may also vary considerably by age cohort and socio-economic status. The social consequences of infection, the medical sequelae, and the paths of recovery from infection may also vary, according to these variables. As a result, different sub-populations may have different experiences of a disease process, including when and how an epidemic comes to an end. This essay suggests that historians' engagement with path-breaking biological and medical anthropological research will allow new approaches to understanding disease processes that will enrich the study of epidemics and their endings. It is organized in three sections. The first discusses some general approaches to and assumptions about epidemics that are used by many historians. The second introduces new perspectives on the study of historical epidemics opened up by the medical anthropological concept of syndemic disease interactions and by an engagement with biological scientific perspectives. It briefly discusses two rural epidemics-one of anemia caused by the syndemic interaction of hookworm and malaria co-infections in early 20th-century British Malaya, and the other of rebound infections caused by the loss of acquired immunity to falciparum malaria in mid-20th-century Liberia-that illustrate, respectively, the utility of the concept of syndemic disease interactions and the centrality of immunological status in understanding epidemic outbreaks in these discrete populations. The third section addresses some of the research considerations involved in moving beyond the single pathogen model of epidemic disease.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causation and models of disease in epidemiology.Alex Broadbent - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (4):302-311.
Does hiv or poverty cause aids? Biomedical and epidemiological perspectives.Albert Mosley - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):399-421.
R 0: Host Longevity Matters.L. M. Viljoen, L. Hemerik & J. Molenaar - 2018 - Acta Biotheoretica 66 (1):1-16.
What is an Epidemic?: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics.Jonny Anomaly - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (3):389-391.
The exotic and the mundane.Paul Farmer - 1990 - Human Nature 1 (4):415-446.
Defining Neglected Disease.Alex Broadbent - 2011 - Biosocieties 6 (1):51-70.
History of Disease and the Longue Durée.Jon Arrizabalaga - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (1):41 - 56.
HIV and the Law: Integrating Law, Policy, and Social Epidemiology.Zita Lazzarini & Robert Klitzman - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (4):533-547.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-03

Downloads
18 (#829,320)

6 months
8 (#353,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How epidemics end.Erica Charters & Kristin Heitman - 2021 - Centaurus 63 (1):210-224.

Add more references