Book Review: Response to Reviewers [Book Review]

Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care 1 (2):246-250 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/193979090800100213

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book Review: Response to Reviewers. [REVIEW]Dallas Willard - 2009 - Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care 2 (2):272-285.
The tragedy of the common reviewers: the peer review process.Ulysses Paulino De Albuquerque - unknown
Characteristics of Peer Review Reports: Editor-Suggested Versus Author-Suggested Reviewers.Jovan Shopovski, Cezary Bolek & Monika Bolek - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):709-726.
Logika Komunikasi (Communication Logics).Zainul Maarif - 2016 - Jakarta, Indonesia: Rajawali Press.
Comment on a review of'legem impone subactis'by baldini, Ugo-reviewers response.A. Depace - 1995 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 50 (4):928-931.
A Demanding Ethics of Care.Eva Feder Kittay - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (2):46-46.
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.Jennifer A. Byrne - 2016 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1).
What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-458.
What We Owe the Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-457.
Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.Boris Kotchoubey, Sarah Bütof & Ranganatha Sitaram - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (4):829-835.
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?Aceil Al-Khatib & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):293-321.
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):293-321.
Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review.Turner Leigh - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Promoting F.A.I.T.h. In Peer review: Five core attributes of effective Peer review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Response to H. Floris Cohen's essay review on Newtonian scholarship.Mordechai Feingold - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Science 52 (2):353-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-20

Downloads
1 (#1,904,823)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references