The Educational Legacy of Michael Oakeshott

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 325-335 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This contribution appraises key aspects of Michael Oakeshott’s legacy to the philosophy of education. It begins with an examination of Oakeshott’s famous conversation metaphor and goes on to review in a number of ways its promise for an adequate understanding of educational thought and educational action. Tracing the influence of Oakeshott’s original thinking in the works of other philosophers, some criticisms of Oakeshott’s educational arguments are also considered.The originality and abiding relevance of Oakeshott’s educational insights are investigated in the later part of the chapter. Complementing the constructive emphasis of the earlier part of the chapter the emphasis here is more critical. Particular attention is given to exploring the resources offered by Oakeshott’s arguments in defending education against forms of bureaucratic control, especially those forms that have become quite common internationally in recent decades.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott.Leslie Marsh - 2005 - In Corey Abel & Timothy Fuller (eds.), In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Imprint Academic.
Michael Oakeshott’s Skepticism.Davide Orsi - 2015 - The European Legacy 20 (6):575-590.
The skeptic's Oakeshott.Steven Anthony Gerencser - 2000 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
The Voice of Liberal Learning. [REVIEW]Terry Hall - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (1):159-161.
The Cambridge companion to Oakeshott.Efraim Podoksik (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott.Terry Nardin - 2001 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Oakeshott's Relationship to Hegel.P. Franco - 2005 - In Corey Abel Timothy Fuller (ed.), The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. pp. 117--31.
Being Otherworldly in the World: Michael Oakeshott on Religion, Aesthetics and Politics.Elizabeth Campbell Corey - 2004 - Dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
5 (#1,542,736)

6 months
1 (#1,475,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references