David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 8 (1):87-99 (1995)
In the first section the problem of political obligation is motivated, and in Section 2 the core structure of the problem is laid bare. A recognition ofthis structure prompts reflection that the problem will appear very different to different thinkers, depending on their moral theories. It also invites the speculation that the problem will be incapable of solution on some moral theories while trivial on others. This polarity does reflect the state of much of the literature until fairly recently. However this picture is seen to be too crude, and in the third section it is shown how an interesting solution has been proposed by advocates of the ‘theory of fairness’. In Section 4 this theory is evaluated, concentrating particularly on George Klosko’s version, which is, in part, rejected. However it is argued that no version of the theory is able to guarantee universal political obligations. In Section 5 it is argued that this is an unnoticed advantage of the theory, for it may well be that, morally at least, we should allow those who do not benefit from the existence of the state to escape political obligations. The consequences of this view are examined and found not to be as threatening as they might first have appeared.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
William A. Edmundson (2004). State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law. Legal Theory 10 (4):215–259.
Hui Jin (2015). Intention, Benefits, and Benefitting From Injustice. South African Journal of Philosophy 34 (2):149-162.
Garrett Cullity (2008). Public Goods and Fairness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):1 – 21.
Kevin Walton (2013). The Particularities of Legitimacy: John Simmons on Political Obligation. Ratio Juris 26 (1):1-15.
Dong-il Kim (2013). Right, Equality, and the Fairness Obligation. Philosophia 41 (3):795-807.
Similar books and articles
George Klosko (2004). Duties to Assist Others and Political Obligations. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):143-159.
George Klosko (2004). Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory 32 (6):801-824.
Dorota Mokrosińska (2013). What is Political About Political Obligation? A Neglected Lesson From Consent Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):88-108.
George Klosko, Michael Keren & Stacy Nyikos (2003). Political Obligation and Military Service in Three Countries. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):37-62.
Bas van der Vossen (2011). Associative Political Obligations: Their Potential. Philosophy Compass 6 (7):488-496.
Andrew Rehfeld (2005). George Klosko, The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation, 2d Ed. With a New Introduction:The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Ethics 115 (2):418-422.
Alan Carter (2006). The Evolution of Rawls's Justification of Political Compliance: Part 1 of the Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls's Theories of Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1):7-21.
P. J. Markie (2009). Political Obligation and the Particularity Problem. Ratio 22 (3):322-337.
Massimo Renzo (2012). Associative Responsibilities and Political Obligation. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):106-127.
George Klosko (2005). Political Obligations. OUP Oxford.
Added to index2009-05-03
Total downloads89 ( #49,561 of 1,934,573 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,381 of 1,934,573 )
How can I increase my downloads?