Abstract

Japanese Marxist scholars, clear moon the Secretary in his masterpiece, "Marx's theory of history", the "pure culture" Marx of the way through from the "Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844" and "Mill commentary" to the 1857-1858 "Critique of Political Economy outline" of the text interpretation of Marx's theory of history has made ​​its own unique interpretation. We believe that the full moon of the various reading of the text is biased, it is necessary to each Critical Study. As the "Critique of Political Economy outline" the core argument is based on full moon, this first of its interpretation of the text to clarify, there are three main issues: First, the so-called "dependency" theory of history, the second is the so-called "labor and all identity "logic, Third Moon of the so-called" theory of alienation rule "of rejection. We believe that only clear misinterpretation of these three issues Mochizuki, in order to truly understand Marx in the book's "three forms of society" theory of the original image