Nash implementation via mechanisms that allow for abstentions

Theory and Decision 91 (2):279-288 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we consider Nash implementability in general settings under the assumption that one may abstain. We show that in the case of at least two individuals, any social choice rule is Nash implementable by mechanisms with abstentions if and only if it is Nash implementable. Moreover, we introduce the notions of minimal participation and participation in equilibrium. We then study the possibility of Nash implementability by mechanisms that satisfy minimal participation or participation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Implementation without rationality assumptions.Ville Korpela - 2012 - Theory and Decision 72 (2):189-203.
The relevance of Nash equilibrium to psychiatric disorders.Tassos Patokos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):245-258.
A Note on Implementation of Bargaining Solutions.Yusuke Samejima - 2005 - Theory and Decision 59 (3):175-191.
The Hypothesis of Nash Equilibrium and Its Bayesian Justification.Paul Weirich - 1994 - In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 245--264.
Equilibrium in Nash´s mind.Vasil Penchev - 2020 - Philosophy of Action eJournal 13 (8):1-11.
Probe and Adjust.Simon M. Huttegger - 2013 - Biological Theory 8 (2):195-200.
Rawlsian Nash solutions.Raul V. Fabella - 1991 - Theory and Decision 30 (2):113-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-11

Downloads
12 (#1,085,611)

6 months
6 (#520,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references