Egalitarian–utilitarian bounds in Nash’s bargaining problem

Theory and Decision 80 (3):427-442 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For every 2-person bargaining problem, the Nash bargaining solution selects a point that is “between” the relative utilitarian point and the relative egalitarian point. Also, it is “between” the utilitarian and egalitarian points. I improve these bounds. I also derive a new characterization of the Nash solution which combines a bounds property together with strong individual rationality and an axiom which is new to Nash’s bargaining model, the sandwich axiom. The sandwich axiom is a weakening of Nash’s IIA.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rational Cooperation and the Nash Bargaining Solution.Michael Moehler - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):577-594.
A Note on Implementation of Bargaining Solutions.Yusuke Samejima - 2005 - Theory and Decision 59 (3):175-191.
Bargaining and Justice.David Gauthier - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):29.
Contractiarianism and Bargaining Theory.Paul Weirich - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:369-385.
Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution.Christopher D. Proulx - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):1-2.
Uniqueness and symmetry in bargaining theories of justice.John Thrasher - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):683-699.
Rational cooperation.Edward McClennen - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):65-93.
Explaining fairness in complex environments.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):81-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
53 (#300,268)

6 months
13 (#192,902)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?