Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence

Journal of Business Ethics 174 (1):177-197 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study investigates whether audit partner gender is associated with the extent of auditor disclosure and the communication style regarding risks of material misstatements that are classified as key audit matters. Using a sample of UK firms during the 2013–2017 period, our results suggest that female audit partners are more likely than male audit partners to disclose more KAMs with more details after controlling for both client and audit firm attributes. Furthermore, female audit partners are found to use a less optimistic tone and provide less readable audit reports, compared to their male counterparts, suggesting that behavioural variances between female and male audit partners may have significant implications on their writing style. Therefore, this study offers new insights on the role of audit partner gender in extended audit reporting. Our findings have important implications for audit firms, investors, policymakers and governments in relation to the development, implementation and enforcement of gender diversity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Audit committee features and earnings management: Further evidence from singapore.J.-L. W. Mitchell Der Zahvann & Greg Tower - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):233-258.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-16

Downloads
43 (#381,354)

6 months
35 (#103,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?