Causality and Human Freedom in Malebranche

Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):321-331 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In that it holds God to be the only true efficient cause, Malebranche’s occasionalism would seem to deny human freedom and to make God responsible for our sins. I argue that Malebranche’s occasionalism must be considered within its Cartesian framework; once one understands what it is to be an occasional cause in this context, Malebranche can be seen as saving a place for human freedom, and he can consistently hold that we are morally responsible for our actions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Freedom in Nicolas Malebranche’s Occasionalism.Emine Gören Bayam - 2024 - Fırat Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (2):219-231.
Malebranche’s Occasionalism.Alan Baker - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):251-272.
Malebranche’s Occasionalism.Alan Baker - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):251-272.
Causation, intentionality, and the case for occasionalism.Walter Ott - 2008 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2):165-187.
Causal and Logical Necessity in Malebranche’s Occasionalism.A. R. J. Fisher - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):523-548.
Occasionalism in the Malebranche-Arnauld Debate.Andrew Gerard Black - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
77 (#210,725)

6 months
5 (#837,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fred Ablondi
Hendrix College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references