Autopoiesis and 4E+ Cognition in the Design of Digital Learning Affordances

Constructivist Foundations 18 (2):325-337 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Context: Challenges in designing digital learning come from the complexity and ever-changing nature of socio-technological systems. Following an autopoietic logic can assist the design of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) systems and their digital learning affordances in education. Problem: The lack of self-maintenance and adaptability considerations in educational technology design, to maintain the efficiency and engagement of TEL systems within ever-changing conditions over time. The concept of autopoiesis, and the 4E+ cognition framework can provide a guiding framework for a more adequate type of the design of TEL systems in education. Method: I exlplore the philosophical and practical aspects of the concept of autopoiesis and 4E+ cognition in the design of digital learning affordances and TEL systems in education. This is motivated by the apparent potential of autopoiesis principles and ideas to inform the design of efficient and engaging digital learning affordances and TEL systems over time. The 4E+ cognition framework is applied to understand the learners’ experience, which in turn informs design principles. Results: Following an autopoiesis and 4E+ cognition framework to configure TEL systems and digital learning affordances has the potential, in theory, to increase the ongoing efficiency and learning engagement of TEL systems in education. An increased efficiency of TEL systems, in turn, can improve the learning process and outcomes for learners, by offering them enhanced digital learning affordances over time. Implications: Embedding autopoiesis, along with 4E+ cognition, in the design of educational technology can guide educational technologists, designers, researchers and practitioners to design more efficient, engaging and long-lasting TEL systems, while addressing the challenges found today in education. Constructivist content: The constructivist content is grounded in the epistemology of the Santiago school of cognition, coming from the work of Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Technology Contribute to Meaningful Learning?Toma Strle - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (2):343-344.
From Within, or the Domain of Design Practice.Claudia Westermann - 2022 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (1):137-139.
Reflections on Autopoiesis, the Signature of Life.Pier Luigi Luisi - 2022 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (1):20-22.
Autopoiesis and Cognition. [REVIEW]G. M. - 1981 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (2):399-402.
Evolution, reproduction and autopoiesis.Francois Durand - 2017 - HTS Theological Studies 73 (3).
Digital Design.M. Morris Mano & Michael D. Ciletti - 2002 - Pearson Educación.
Nonlinear cobweb of cognition.Helena Knyazeva - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (3):167-179.
Cognitive Agency Without Individuality.Amanda Corris - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):370-371.
Does Social Systems Theory Need a General Theory of Autopoiesis?R. D. King - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):183-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-29

Downloads
5 (#1,559,673)

6 months
3 (#1,044,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references