Detachment and defeasibility in deontic logic
Studia Logica 57 (1):5 - 18 (1996)
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to present a logical framework that allow to formalize a kind of prima facie duties, defeasible conditional duties, indefeasible conditional duties and actual (indefeasible) duties, as well as to show their logical interconnectionsDOI
10.1007/bf00370667
My notes
Similar books and articles
Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning.Henry Prakken - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):73 - 90.
Don’t Ever Do That! Long-term Duties in PD e L.Jesse Hughes & Lambèr M. M. Royakkers - 2008 - Studia Logica 89 (1):59 - 79.
Three characterizability problems in deontic logic.Lennart Åqvist - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):65-82.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
132 (#96,757)
6 months
3 (#227,001)
2009-01-28
Downloads
132 (#96,757)
6 months
3 (#227,001)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
AGM 25 Years: Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief Change.Eduardo Fermé & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):295 - 331.
AGM 25 Years: Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief Change.Eduardo Fermé & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):295-331.
Decisional nonconsequentialism and the risk sensitivity of obligation.Horacio Spector - 2016 - Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (2):91-128.
The categorical imperative: Category theory as a foundation for deontic logic.Clayton Peterson - 2014 - Journal of Applied Logic 12 (4):417-461.
References found in this work
Semantic Analyses for Dyadic Deontic Logic.David K. Lewis - 1974 - In Sören Stenlund (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis: Essays Dedicated to Stig Kanger on His Fiftieth Birthday. Reidel. pp. 1-14.
The Logic of Conditional Obligation.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (3/4):417.
