Chôra 15:313-331 (2017)

Authors
Francesca Alesse
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Abstract
The question I deal with is Aristotle’s treatment of agathon in Metaphysics VII 6, as compared to the treatment of the same notion in famous passages from Ethics and Topics. In these latter agathon is considered as homonymous in that it assumes as many meanings as the categories, whereas in Metaphysics VII 6 Aristotle employes the example of agathon in order to examine the relationship between every reality in itself and its essence. In this context Aristotle uses the notion of “good in itself ”, as an example of ἕκαστον which should be identical to its essence : as a consequence of such an identity, “good in itself ” shoud be a synonymous notion and have a univocal definition. Is the treatment of agathon in Metaphysics VII 6 opposed to what Aristotle claims in Ethics and Topics? In my opinion, what is to be pointed out is not a contradiction, but a difference in perspective, which has rarely been emphasised. My aim is to analyse the possible reasons for this difference in perspective.
Keywords History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1583-8617
DOI 10.5840/chora2017/201815/1617
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Quelques remarques sur la: Notion d'intensité en psychologie.Élie Halévy - 1898 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 6 (5):589 - 607.
De quelques remarques sur la theorie et l'experience chez Descartes et chez Kant.Jean Ferrari - 2002 - In Helmut Linneweber-Lammerskitten & Georg Mohr (eds.), Interpretation Und Argument. Koenigshausen & Neumann. pp. 145.
Le hasard chez aristote et chez cournot.G. Milhaud - 1902 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 10 (6):667 - 681.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-04-25

Total views
14 ( #734,864 of 2,517,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes