Book Notes [Book Review]

Ethics 113 (4):923-928 (2003)
Alison Bailey
Illinois State University
Maudemarie Clark
University of California, Riverside
Samir Haddad
Fordham University
1 more
It's surprising that contemporary moral philosophers have not thought more about food. The rapidly expanding industrialized landscape of modern western agribusiness raises moral concerns about large-scale livestock production, the increased usage of genetically modified crops, and the effects these now common practices may have on long-term environmental and human health. Here Pence argues that biotechnology is more helpful than harmful, on the ground that it will abate world hunger. Positioning himself as an "impartialbioethicist" he sets about the task of sorting through the extremism he thinks drives all environ- mental movements' opposition to genetically modified (GM) crops. His argu- ment is simple: the claim that GM foods are unsafe is the product of alarmism, not sound reason. Discarding what environmentalists have called the Precau- tionary Principle, he argues that GM foods are safe because they have not been proven unsafe. And GM foods have been tested more than many food products now on the market.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/374004
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,829
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Does Autonomy Count in Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food?Kirsten Hansen - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society. [REVIEW]Assya Pascalev - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):583-594.
Are Genetically Modified Foods Good for You? A Pragmatic Answer.S. K. Wertz - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):129-137.
What's Wrong with Functional Foods?David M. Kaplan - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):177-187.
Argumentation Theory and GM Foods.Miltos Ladikas & Doris Schroeder - 2005 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (3):216-225.
Trust, Food, and Health. Questions of Trust at the Interface Between Food and Health.Franck L. B. Meijboom - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):231-245.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
122 ( #50,967 of 2,293,791 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #36,497 of 2,293,791 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature