Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):325-329 (1999)
AbstractMy aim is to suggest that there is a case for using a randomised consent design in some neonatal trials. As an example I use the trials of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in neonates suffering pulmonary hypertension. In some trials the process of obtaining consent has the potential to harm the subject, for example, by disappointing those who end in the control group and by creating additional anxiety at times of acute illness. An example of such were the trials of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in neonates suffering pulmonary hypertension. Pre-randomised consent could avoid or lessen these harms. However, a number of ethical objections are made to these research designs. They involve denial of information, using people, denial of choice, and "overselling" of allocated treatment. Furthermore, they are the wrong response; better communication might be the answer, for example. I argue that these objections are not completely persuasive. However, they are enough to suggest caution in the use of such designs
Similar books and articles
Improving the quality of consent to randomised controlled trials by using continuous consent and clinician training in the consent process.P. Allmark - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):439-443.
Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?P. Allmark - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):548-553.
Neonatal euthanasia: Why require parental consent? [REVIEW]Jacob M. Appel - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4):477-482.
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Gordon C. S. Smith & Jill P. Pell - 2003 - Bmj 327 (7429):1459--61.
Reporting of patient consent in healthcare cluster randomised trials is associated with the type of study interventions and publication characteristics.Andrew McRae, Monica Taljaard, Charles Weijer, Carol Bennett, Zoe Skea, Robert Boruch, Jamie Brehaut, Martin Eccles, Jeremy Grimshaw & Allan Donner - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):119-124.
The Need for Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational Research.Carole J. Torgerson & David J. Torgerson - 2001 - British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (3):316 - 328.
Compromised ethical principles in randomised clinical trials of distant, intercessory prayer.Peter Graeme Hobbins - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):142-152.
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent.Jane L. Hutton & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (1):41-53.
Consent and randomized clinical trials: Are there moral or design problems?Loretta Kopelman - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):317-345.
Update on unethical use of placebos in randomised trials.Karin B. Michels & Kenneth J. Rothman - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (2):188–204.
Randomised clinical trials: a source of ethical dilemmas.F. Verdu-Pascual - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):177-178.
The practical and ethical defects of surgical randomised prospective trials.A. Byer - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):90-93.
Is it ethical to keep interim findings of randomised controlled trials confidential?F. G. Miller & D. Wendler - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):198-201.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Research into emergency treatments--could the offer of 'advance directives' help?R. Gillon - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):291-292.
References found in this work
No references found.