Social media users’ attitudes toward pervasiveness of fake news in Arab countries and its negative effects: Kuwait as a case study

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 21 (3):322-341 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the respondents’ evaluation of the pervasiveness of fake news through various SM platforms in Kuwait. The authors also examined the respondents’ attitudes toward most fake news on SM. A total of 1,539 Kuwaitis were selected. Design/methodology/approach The questionnaire was the major tool for this study. The respondents, from whom demographic information was obtained, were asked about which SM platforms most frequently spread fake news, their attitudes toward the subjects most frequently involved in spreading fake news, their degree of use of the six SM platforms and interest in various subjects, and the attitudes toward the negative nature of SM news. SPSS was used for the data analysis. Findings The results showed that WhatsApp was the most likely to be used to disseminate fake news; Twitter and Instagram ranked second. The younger subjects were affected more by text and voice clips than the older ones. Originality/value The study, hopefully, produces new knowledge on the subject of fake news in social media, especially in the Arab world, since there are few studies conducted in the region. The study showed that WhatsApp was the SM tool most likely to be responsible for disseminating fake news in Kuwait, which may shed light on the usage of this application to be a news tool, rather than merely an interpersonal communication medium.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is fake news?Romy Jaster & David Lanius - 2018 - Versus 2 (127):207-227.
What is fake news?M. R. X. Dentith - 2018 - University of Bucharest Review (2):24-34.
Proposing a model of social media user interaction with fake news.Abhijeet R. Shirsat, Angel F. González & Judith J. May - 2022 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 20 (1):134-149.
Fake News: A Definition.Axel Gelfert - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):84-117.
Fake news. A continuation or rejection of the traditional news paradigm?Marek Palczewski - 2017 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 43 (5):23-34.
Pragmatist Media Ethics and the Challenges of Fake News.Scott R. Stroud - 2019 - Journal of Media Ethics 34 (4):178-192.
Fake News and Partisan Epistemology.Regina Rini - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2):43-64.
Free Speech and the Legal Prohibition of Fake News.Étienne Brown - 2023 - Social Theory and Practice 49 (1):29-55.
III. Therapies of Fake News. The Virtue of Epistemic Trustworthiness and Re-Posting on Social Media.Sarah Wright - 2021 - In Sven Bernecker, Amy K. Flowerree & Thomas Grundmann (eds.), The Epistemology of Fake News. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-06

Downloads
27 (#584,888)

6 months
19 (#133,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fake News and Partisan Epistemology.Regina Rini - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2):43-64.
Fake News: A Definition.Axel Gelfert - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):84-117.

Add more references