Philosophy of Science 61 (4):556-578 (1994)

Abstract
The so-called "adaptationism" of mainstream evolutionary biology has been criticized from a variety of sources. One, which has received relatively little philosophical attention, is developmental biology. Developmental constraints are said to be neglected by adaptationists. This paper explores the divergent methodological and explanatory interests that separate mainstream evolutionary biology from its embryological and developmental critics. It will focus on the concept of constraint itself; even this central concept is understood differently by the two sides of the dispute
Keywords Developmental Systems Theory   Biology   Adaptationism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289822
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,037
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Seven Types of Adaptationism.Tim Lewens - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):161-182.
What Evolvability Really Is.Rachael L. Brown - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (3):axt014.

View all 67 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
179 ( #59,810 of 2,454,418 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #65,055 of 2,454,418 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes