Ethics Review of Biomedical Research in Uzbekistan: Policy and Program Gaps

Asian Bioethics Review:1-9 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We describe the national health research ethics review system of Uzbekistan and identify policy and program gaps that impede the protection of human research subjects. We find that the National Ethic Committee (NEC), functioning at the national level, is solely responsible for conducting research ethics review. There is little evidence that regional ethics committees work as intended, and there is no research ethics review at medical institutes and research centers even though they conduct CDTs (clinical drug trials). There is no national policy for the ethical review of non-clinical trials. We recommend the establishment of institutional review boards (IRBs) at medical institutes and research centers while at the same time building capacity at the national level to oversee and support the research ethics review system of the entire country.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
A national committee for the ethics of research.M. G. Gelder - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):146-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-18

Downloads
8 (#1,334,194)

6 months
8 (#506,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?