Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief: Epistemology in South Asian Philosophy of Religion

Columbia University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In _Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief_, Dan Arnold examines how the Brahmanical tradition of Purva Mimamsa and the writings of the seventh-century Buddhist Madhyamika philosopher Candrakirti challenged dominant Indian Buddhist views of epistemology. Arnold retrieves these two very different but equally important voices of philosophical dissent, showing them to have developed highly sophisticated and cogent critiques of influential Buddhist epistemologists such as Dignaga and Dharmakirti. His analysis--developed in conversation with modern Western philosophers like William Alston and J. L. Austin--offers an innovative reinterpretation of the Indian philosophical tradition, while suggesting that pre-modern Indian thinkers have much to contribute to contemporary philosophical debates. In logically distinct ways, Purva Mimamsa and Candrakirti's Madhyamaka opposed the influential Buddhist school of thought that emphasized the foundational character of perception. Arnold argues that Mimamsaka arguments concerning the "intrinsic validity" of the earliest Vedic scriptures are best understood as a critique of the tradition of Buddhist philosophy stemming from Dignaga. Though often dismissed as antithetical to "real philosophy," Mimamsaka thought has affinities with the reformed epistemology that has recently influenced contemporary philosophy of religion. Candrakirti's arguments, in contrast, amount to a principled refusal of epistemology. Arnold contends that Candrakirti marshals against Buddhist foundationalism an approach that resembles twentieth-century ordinary language philosophy--and does so by employing what are finally best understood as transcendental arguments. The conclusion that Candrakirti's arguments thus support a metaphysical claim represents a bold new understanding of Madhyamaka



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The epistemology of religiosity: an Orthodox Jewish perspective.Samuel Lebens - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (3):315-332.
Indexical Reference and the Ontology of Belief.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1982 - South African Journal of Philosophy 1:65-74.
Asian Modernization and Mediatization of Religion.Sunny Yoon - 2014 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 13 (39):68-90.
Theism in Asian Philosophy.Matthew R. Dasti - 2012 - In C. Taliaferro, V. Harrison & S. Goetz (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Theism. Routledge.
On the Tragedy of Philosopher’s Belief.Baichun Zhang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:373-378.
American Transcendentalism and Asian Religions. [REVIEW]Jeffrey DiLeo - 1994 - Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 22 (68):21-24.


Added to PP

19 (#705,026)

6 months
8 (#187,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Arnold
University of Chicago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references