The Role of Comparisons in Judgments of Loneliness

Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Loneliness—perceived social isolation—is defined as a discrepancy between existing social relationships and desired quality of relationships. Whereas most research has focused on existing relationships, we consider the standards against which people compare them. Participants who made downward social or temporal comparisons that depicted their contact with others as better reported less loneliness than participants who made upward comparisons that depicted their contact with others as worse. Extending these causal results, in a survey of British adults, upward social comparisons predicted current loneliness, even when controlling for loneliness at a previous point in time. Finally, content analyses of interviews with American adults who lived alone showed that social and temporal comparisons about contact with others were both prevalent and linked to expressed loneliness. These findings contribute to understanding the social cognition of loneliness, extend the effects of comparisons about social connection to the important public health problem of loneliness, and provide a novel tool for acutely manipulating loneliness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Loneliness as Cause.Elena Popa - 2023 - Topoi 42 (5):1175-1184.
Social Robots to Fend Off Loneliness?Zohar Lederman & Nancy S. Jecker - 2023 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 33 (3):249-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-24

Downloads
9 (#1,281,906)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations