What's So Special about the Human Genome?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):422-424 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Glenn McGee argues that the time is now for debating the morality of patenting human genes. In one sense he is surely right. While thousands of patents have been issued or are pending on many gene sequences, public policy with respect to ownership of the human genome is still far from settled. So a debate about the ethics of patenting genes is, if nothing else, timely. In another sense however, Professor McGee is wrong

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The human genome project and the social contract: A law policy approach.Christian Byk - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):371-380.
Free will and the genome project.Patricia S. Greenspan - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1):31-43.
Subversive Reflections on the Human Genome Project.Alex Rosenberg - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:329 - 335.
Should we change the human genome?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
79 (#209,828)

6 months
7 (#419,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arthur L. Caplan
New York University

Citations of this work

Human gene patents: Core issues in a multi-layered debate. [REVIEW]Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):211-221.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Gene Patents Can Be Ethical.Glenn Mcgee - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):417-421.

Add more references