Validity and Reliability Estimates of the Experience, Understanding, Reflection, Decision Function Indicator

Dissertation, United States International University (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Problem. The purpose of the study was to initiate the process of determining the validity and reliability of the Experience, Understanding, Reflection, Decision Function Indicator developed by the researcher for measuring four function bases. The study investigated the following questions: to what degree do the words drawn from Bernard Lonergan's writings to be used in the EURD Function Indicator validly represent his four functions of experience, understanding, reflection, and decision; to what degree do the words taken from Roget's International Thesaurus and The Merriam-Webster Pocket Dictionary of Synonyms for use in the EURD Function Indicator validly represent Lonergan's four functions; to what degree are the items of the EURD Function Indicator reliable to a sample of psychotherapists; to what degree do the items of the EURD Function Indicator have validity as a measurement of Lonergan's four functions in the consciousness of the psychotherapist; to what degree do the items of the EURD Function Indicator measure the same function? ;Method. Bernard Lonergan matched descriptions contained in the EURD Function Indicator with corresponding function base categories. Five panelists completed a synonym test matching words with Lonergan's four functions. Ten graduate students of psychology judged the similarity of meaning between items of parallel forms of the EURD. Forty-six psychotherapists/counselors completed two equivalent alternate forms of the EURD. ;Results. Lonergan achieved 82 percent agreement when matching descriptions to function base category titles. The five panelists' matching of synonyms with Lonergan's four categories and associated words obtained an overall agreement of 93 percent. Ten expert judges' evaluations of item similarity resulted in all the percentages falling beween 3 and 5 with an overall average item similarity of 4.23 . The forty-six psychotherapists' or counselors' scores on the EURD achieved an overall average percentage of agreement of 83 percent between Form A and Form B

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indicator semantics and Dretske's function.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):367-82.
Function and content words evoke different brain potentials.Robert M. Chapman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):282-284.
Fitness and function.D. M. Walsh - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):553-574.
In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
System function languages.M. B. Thuraisingham - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):357-366.
The Rationalizability of Two-Step Choices.Ruth Poproski - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):713 - 743.
Exact calculation of inverse functions.Josef Berger - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (2):201-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references