The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes
Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):1-18 (2012)
The possibility of using private military and security companies to bolster the capacity to undertake intervention for human rights purposes has been increasingly debated. The focus of such discussions has, however, largely been on practical issues and the contingent problems posed by private force. By contrast, this article considers the principled case for privatising humanitarian intervention. It focuses on two central issues. First, does outsourcing humanitarian intervention to private military and security companies pose some fundamental, deeper problems in this context, such as an abdication of a state's duties? Second, on the other hand, is there a case for preferring these firms to other, state-based agents of humanitarian intervention? For instance, given a state's duties to their own military personnel, should the use of private military and security contractors be preferred to regular soldiers for humanitarian intervention?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Is There a Duty to Intervene? Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect.James Pattison - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):570-579.
Similar books and articles
Revisiting the Role of Private Military and Security Companies.George Andreopoulos & Shawna Brandle - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):138-157.
New Wars and New Soldiers: Military Ethics in the Contemporary World.Paolo Tripodi & Jessica Wolfendale (eds.) - 2011 - Ashgate.
The Military and the Community: Comparing National Military Forces and Private Military Companies.Jessica Wolfendale - 2008 - In Andrew Alexandra, Deane-Peter Baker & Marina Caparini (eds.), Private Military and Security Companies: Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations. Routledge.
The Legitimacy of the Military, Private Military and Security Companies, and Just War Theory.J. Pattison - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):131-154.
Humanitarian Military Intervention: Wars for the End of History?Clifford Orwin - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):196-217.
Humanitarian Intervention, Consent, and Proportionality.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - In N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen & Jeff McMahan (eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. Oxford University Press.
Jus Ad Bellum, Values, and the Contemporary Structure of International Law.Sean D. Murphy - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):20-26.
Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations.M. Welsh Jennifer (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Peaceful Warriors: Private Military Security Companies and the Quest for Stable Societies. [REVIEW]Don Mayer - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):387 - 401.
Mind the Gap: Lacunae in the International Legal Framework Governing Private Military and Security Companies.Benjamin Perrin - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):213-232.
Private Military and Security Companies: Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations.Andrew Alexandra, Deane-Peter Baker & Marina Caparini (eds.) - 2008 - Routledge.
Humanitarian Intervention and the Distribution of Sovereignty in International Law.Patrick Macklem - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4):369-393.
Cultural Rights: The Possible Impact of Private Military and Security Companies.Ana Filipa Vrdoljak - unknown
Unaccountable: The Current State of Private Military and Security Companies.Marcus Hedahl - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):175-192.
Legitimacy, Humanitarian Intervention, and International Institutions.M. Kahler - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.
Added to index2011-12-17
Total downloads48 ( #107,308 of 2,158,458 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,692 of 2,158,458 )
How can I increase my downloads?