Response to Focus Issue

Journal of Religious Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Barnett responds to three articles that put the thought of Søren Kierkegaard in conversation with modern popular media. He argues that each of these pieces demonstrates that Kierkegaard's criticism of the burgeoning free press remains relevant today, particularly in the areas of journalistic practice, mental health, and political responsibility. At the same time, however, Barnett wonders if the radical nature of the Dane's critique has been fully considered. For Kierkegaard, in other words, it is not just that popular media have flaws in need of correction; it is that the media constitute “the evil principle in the modern world.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kierkegaard, Social Media, and Despair.Tekoa Robinson - forthcoming - Journal of Religious Ethics.
Christopher B. Barnett: Kierkegaard – Pietism and Holiness.Dennis Vanden Auweele - 2011 - Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 64 (2):195-197.
Kierkegaard and Heidegger.Clare Carlisle - 2013 - In John Lippitt & George Pattison (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Kierkegaard. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. pp. 421.
Søren Kierkegaard and the Impossibility of (Un)Forgiveness.G. P. Marcar - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (4):716-734.
Kierkegaard: a very short introduction.Patrick L. Gardiner - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-12

Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references