Feminist Studies 38 (2):330-62 (2012)

Abstract

During a smallpox epidemic in April 1721, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu asked Dr. Charles Maitland to "engraft" her daughter, thus instigating the first documented inoculation for smallpox (_Variola_ virus) in England. Engrafting, or variolation, was a means of conferring immunity to smallpox by placing pus taken from a smallpox pustule under the skin of an uninfected person to create a local infection. The introduction of infectious viral matter, however, could trigger fullblown smallpox, and the practice was controversial for both this reason and the pervasive conviction that it was immoral to intentionally infect a human body. Eventually, engrafting was phased out altogether in favor of vaccination, a much safer procedure established by Edward Jenner in the late eighteenth century. Montagu's decision was influenced by her experiences in Constantinople, where she had spent a year, and where engrafting was commonplace. As a smallpox survivor herself, Montagu had taken an interest in Turkish inoculation practices, and had had her son Edward engrafted while in Turkey. She was not the first person to import the idea of smallpox inoculation to England, nor the first English person to have their child inoculated (other English children had been inoculated while visiting Turkey), yet she quickly became known for importing and popularizing smallpox inoculation. At the request of her acquaintances, she took her inoculated daughter with her on a round of visits into elite households to demonstrate the safety of the procedure. The reputation she gained was both positive and negative: monuments were erected in her honor, encomiastic poems were published, and Voltaire declared her "a woman of as fine a genius, and endued with as great a strength of mind as any of her sex in the British Kingdoms"; however, anti-inoculationists ridiculed her, some society figures regarded her warily, and Alexander Pope satirized her in his poetry.

Montagu’s pioneering role in the smallpox debate is undoubtedly significant: she instigated the first smallpox inoculation on English soil, and she was largely responsible for making the practice acceptable in elite circles. My interest in this essay is in the nature and significance of Montagu’s reputation as an inoculation pioneer. I will argue that her reputation was based on the particular combination of her social position as a Whig and an aristocratic woman; her interest in progressive and enlightened forms of social, political, and scientific thought; her standing in influential literary circles; and, not least, the force of her own personality. In broad terms, I offer Montagu’s involvement in the smallpox debate as a case study in a new kind of public role becoming available to elite women in the early eighteenth century — a role that caused considerable discomfort among her peers and in the medical community, and one that stimulated a widespread controversy in print publications of the day
Keywords Mary Wortley Montagu, Variola, smallpox, innoculation, variolation, engrafting, vaccination
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

La Métaphore Vaccine. De l'Inoculation À la Vaccinologie.Anne Marie Moulin - 1992 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 14 (2):271 - 297.
Smallpox Revisited?Michael J. Selgelid - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):5 – 11.
Should Smallpox Vaccine Be Made Available to the General Public?Thomas May & Ross D. Silverman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):67-82.
Smallpox: Emergence, Global Spread, and Eradication.Frank Fenner - 1993 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 15 (3):397 - 420.
Labor's View of Quality of Working Life Programs.Jerry Wurf - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):131 - 137.
On Exploiting Inferiors.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Between the Species 11 (1-2):1--24.
Vaccination-Induced Syphilis and the Hübner Malpractice Litigation.Thomas G. Benedek - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (1):92-113.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-30

Total views
51 ( #181,148 of 2,326,130 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #284,939 of 2,326,130 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes