When Public Health and Genetic Privacy Collide: Positive and Normative Theories Explaining How ACA's Expansion of Corporate Wellness Programs Conflicts with GINA's Privacy Rules
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):469-487 (2011)
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) contains many provisions intended to increase access to and lower the cost of health care by adopting public health measures. One of these promotes the use of at-work wellness programs by both providing employers with grants to develop these programs and also increasing their ability to tie the price employees pay for health insurance for participating in these programs and meeting specific health goals. Yet despite ACA's specific alteration of three different statues which had in the past shielded employees from having to contribute to the cost of their health insurance based on their achieving employer-designated health markers, it chose to leave alone recently enacted rules implementing the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act (GINA), which prohibits employers from asking employees about their family health history in any context, including assessing their risk for setting wellness targets. This article reviews how both the changes made by ACA and the restrictions recently put place by GINA will affect the way employers are likely to structure Wellness Programs. It also considers how these changes reflect the competing social goals of both ACA, which seeks to expand access to the population by lowering costs, and GINA, which seeks to protect individuals from discrimination. It does so by analyzing both positive theories about how these new laws will function and normative theories explaining the likelihood of future friction between the interests of the population of the United States as a whole who are in need of increased and affordable access to health care, and of the individuals living in this country who risk discrimination, as science and medicine continue to make advances in linking genetic make-up to risk of future illness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Health, and the Elusive Target of Human Rights.Lance Gable - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):340-354.
The Law, Policy, and Ethics of Employers' Use of Financial Incentives to Improve Health.Kristin M. Madison, Kevin G. Volpp & Scott D. Halpern - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):450-468.
Necessary Health Care and Basic Needs: Health Insurance Plans and Essential Benefits. [REVIEW]Andrew Ward & Pamela Jo Johnson - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (4):355-371.
PPACA and Public Health: Creating a Framework to Focus on Prevention and Wellness and Improve the Public's Health.Gwendolyn Roberts Majette - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):366-379.
The Affordable Care Act's Preventive Services Mandate: Breaking Down the Barriers to Nationwide Access to Preventive Services.John Aloysius Cogan - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):355-365.
From Health Care Reform to Public Health Reform.Micah L. Berman - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):328-339.
Improving the Population's Health: The Affordable Care Act and the Importance of Integration.Lorian E. Hardcastle, Katherine L. Record, Peter D. Jacobson & Lawrence O. Gostin - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):317-327.
Health Information: Reconciling Personal Privacy with the Public Good of Human Health. [REVIEW]Lawrence O. Gostin - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):321-335.
Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement.B. M. Kious - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.
Obesity and Health System Reform: Private Vs. Public Responsibility.Y. Tony Yang & Len M. Nichols - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):380-386.
Health Care Resource Prioritization and Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities.Dan W. Brock - unknown
Vaccination Policy and Ethical Challenges Posed by Herd Immunity, Suboptimal Uptake and Subgroup Targeting.J. Luyten, A. Vandevelde, P. Van Damme & P. Beutels - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):280-291.
Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening.Robert H. Blank - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
Reassessing Insurers' Access to Genetic Information: Genetic Privacy, Ignorance, and Injustice.Eli Feiring - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (5):300-310.
Added to index2011-08-23
Total downloads15 ( #314,104 of 2,168,327 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,274 of 2,168,327 )
How can I increase my downloads?