- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A New Argument for the Multiplicity of the Good-for Relation
Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2):121-133 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Must We Be Just Plain Good? On Regress Arguments for the Value of Humanity.L. Nandi Theunissen - 2018 - Ethics 128 (2):346-372.
Value Inquiry: On concepts of good and evil in ethical theories.M. Moss - 1992 - Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (3):311.
New does not mean true: concerning the right and the good. [REVIEW]Peter Drum - 1999 - Journal of Value Inquiry 33 (2):253-254.
The Finality and Instrumentality of Value in a Way.Andrés G. Garcia - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (3):681-692.
The Nature of Goodness.W. D. Ross - 1930 - In William David Ross, The Right and the Good. Some Problems in Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
The Singular Analysis of the “Good For” Relation.Michael Hayes - 2023 - Journal of Value Inquiry 57 (2):257-275.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-09-07
Downloads
121 (#189,218)
6 months
15 (#211,526)
2011-09-07
Downloads
121 (#189,218)
6 months
15 (#211,526)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Conservatisms about the Valuable.Jacob M. Nebel - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (1):180-194.
Machines as Moral Patients We Shouldn’t Care About : The Interests and Welfare of Current Machines.John Basl - 2014 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (1):79-96.
Value taxonomy.Wlodek Rabinowicz & Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen - 2015 - In Tobias Brosch & David Sander, Handbook of Value: Perspectives From Economics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology and Sociolog. Oxford University Press UK. pp. 23-42.
The Singular Analysis of the “Good For” Relation.Michael Hayes - 2023 - Journal of Value Inquiry 57 (2):257-275.
References found in this work
3. A Rebuttal on Functions.Christopher Boorse - 2002 - In André Ariew, Robert Cummins & Mark Perlman, Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 63.
Relational good and the multiplicity problem.Connie S. Rosati - 2009 - Philosophical Issues 19 (1):205-234.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-cj6sj uwo